Planning commission leans toward district-based PUD requirement rather than NRO trigger
After reviewing two options for when to require planned-unit-development (PUD) review, commissioners signaled support for tying PUDs to zoning district purpose (option B) rather than relying on the mapped natural-resource-overlay (NRO) as the primary trigger.
The full story
Staff described two approaches for when PUD review should be required: (a) require PUD only when multiple criteria are present (major subdivision plus district plus mapped NRO feature) or (b) require PUD based primarily on district and major-subdivision status. "My recommendation is to go with that," the presenter said in favor of option B, which ties PUD review to the zoning district's purpose and objectives rather than letting mapped NRO features alone determine review requirements.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in