Neighbors cite studies predicting property‑value drops; applicant counters with alternate research and Elko experience
Appellants cited academic work they said shows nearby substance‑use treatment centers can depress property values by 8%–17%; Vitality disputed the methodology, cited a 2018 review finding no effect when controls applied, and presented examples from their existing facility where neighbors reported no negative impact.
The full story
Appellants raised economic concerns, telling the Board that published research can show sizable drops in nearby property values when treatment centers locate in a neighborhood. Michael Hartman referenced a 2014 study he submitted that he said found an 8% decrease in property values associated with nearby SUD facilities and suggested impact could rise to 17% for opioid‑focused centers.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in