Committee weighs design‑build route versus separate architectural RFP
May 21, 2026
May 21, 2026
Members debated whether to solicit a separate architectural RFP or run a concurrent design‑build procurement; some argued design‑build firms bundle risk and can accelerate schedules while others warned it could limit cost transparency and budgeting for a warrant.
The full story
Committee members debated two procurement approaches for the next phase: running a traditional architectural RFP or advertising a design‑build procurement that would deliver design and construction as a package.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →