State Supreme Court hears challenge to Best Buy arbitration clause in Johnson case
Oct 8, 2026
The court heard argument over whether online click-through arbitration provisions in low-wage hiring processes can bar jury trials, focusing on whether adhesive contract tests like Raiford apply or are preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
The full story
The State Supreme Court heard argument in Johnson v. Best Buy on whether an arbitration provision embedded in an online job application can strip an employee of the right to a jury trial. Carla Akins, counsel for the petitioner Johnson, told the court that the case is a contract-formation and unconscionability question: "What permits a court simply to presume that clicking through that process means I knowingly surrender my right to have a jury decide what happens if this company later violates my rights?" Akins emphasized that click-through repetition should not be treated as dispositive proof of assent.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →