Board clash over proposed code-of-ethics change devolves into heated exchange

Board members, parents and community speakers sparred over a proposed amendment to subsection P of the board's code of ethics, which would require members to "accept the will of the majority" after a vote. Critics called it vague and a potential curb on free speech; supporters said it prevents board members from publicly undermining board decisions. The board agreed to further study the issue and recommended legal review and a retreat.