Committee excludes Malden & Jenkins from scoring for missing required forms
Staff found Malden & Jenkins omitted two RFP requirements — an affirmative acceptance of the contract under city terms and a notarized sworn statement on public‑entity crimes — and the committee voted to exclude the firm from scoring.
The full story
Staff told the committee that Malden & Jenkins met many receipt and packaging requirements but failed to provide two specific required items in the RFP packet.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in