Panel narrows field using weighted rankings before appointing replacement
Members debated narrowing nine candidates by selecting top-three lists, then used a weighted scoring method (3-2-1) to total rankings; that tally showed Nathan McCaffrey leading before a motion to appoint was made.
The full story
Panel members debated several methods for reducing nine applicants to a manageable shortlist. Some members suggested each person write their top three candidates and check for common denominators; others discussed removing candidates not present. Speaker 7 proposed a weighted scoring system and explained how first-, second- and third-place votes would be assigned 3, 2, and 1 points respectively.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in