Group flags inconsistent accessory-building thresholds and setback rules
Reviewers found inconsistent square-foot thresholds and setback rules for accessory structures and proposed removing redundant categories and clarifying how small sheds and ADUs are measured and permitted.
The full story
Committee members identified inconsistencies in how accessory buildings are treated by the draft code, including differing thresholds (examples discussed: 140 sq ft, 120 sq ft, 200 sq ft) that produced contradictory setback consequences. S1 and others proposed removing redundant categories and standardizing setback language to avoid confusing outcomes for property owners.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in