Board presses developer on egress for third‑floor units at 91 Main St.
Planning board members questioned fire escape and second‑means‑of‑egress provisions for proposed third‑floor and rear units at 91 Main St.; the architect agreed to meet all code egress requirements and the board attached egress compliance as a condition of approval.
The full story
Board members raised safety concerns about access and fire egress for new third‑floor and rear units during testimony on the 91 Main St. application. John Burke and Alfred Sauer specifically questioned whether the rear apartment and third floor would have adequate means of escape; the board stressed the need for a second means of egress where required.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in