Chair calls capital improvement master plan a 'justification' document; staff pledges deeper analyses
During review of the master plan, Chair John Carr criticized the document as a post'hoc justification of decisions already made; the superintendent and staff said future project presentations will include more detailed independent analyses and options.
The full story
Clayton Anderson, the district'level presenter, walked the panel through the structure of the Master Plan for Capital Projects and explained the document contains project descriptions, photos, four options for each major item, and a recommended action with supporting justification. Anderson said subsequent projects will receive official assessments and more detailed analysis before being advanced to the CIP.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in