Neighbors press developer on noise study and equipment substitutions
Oct 15, 2026
Residents asked whether the applicant modeled every substitute equipment manufacturer and challenged assumptions used in the noise study; the company said a site‑specific noise study was submitted using conservative assumptions but conceded it had not modeled every potential substitute manufacturer.
The full story
Multiple residents told the committee they remain concerned that the noise analysis may not reflect worst‑case conditions or substitutions in equipment manufacturers. A nearby resident asked whether the study modeled all possible inverter or transformer manufacturers; Jack Curry said, “We did conduct a site specific noise study demonstrating that the product equipment proposed in the site would be within the state and the county noise level requirements,” but conceded the team had not modeled “every potential substitute manufacturer.”
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →