Committee discusses bargaining route, compression fixes and reliance on MOU rather than statute
Members deliberated whether to codify a dollar figure in statute or rely on an MOU and ledger/deck; staff said they prefer an MOU/partnership reference and a placeholder funding approach with true-up during the supplemental process to avoid annually amending statute.
The full story
Committee members questioned whether the proposed $19.29 figure should be placed in statute. Director Mark Ferrandino and counsel said they would not typically put a negotiated bargaining number into statute and would instead rely on the partnership agreement or an MOU and a ledger or supplemental true-up to show legislative intent.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in