Council: town cannot generally require completion bonds for private development; nuisance enforcement options remain under review
Jan 21, 2026
Staff told council the town lacks general authority to force private developers to post completion bonds for entirely private projects; council declined to pursue mandatory completion bonds and gave mixed direction on nuisance‑code amendments to address stalled or neglected properties.
The full story
Senior Town Planner Ned West presented staff research on completion and performance bonds and told the council that while public‑project and development‑agreement guarantees exist (including a common structure that asks for 120% of public‑improvement costs with a one‑year warranty holdback), there is no straightforward way to compel a private developer to post a completion bond on private property where no public dollars are invested. "In general terms, private development where there are not public dollars involved...there really is no way to require a private developer to place a bond with a public entity," he said. West noted a potential financing approach where a town contribution in the order of 10% could change tax/partnership treatment, but said that path would require legal and financial advice.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →