Audit of draft coverage and editorial notes

Audit findings and fixes applied: 1) Contract date inconsistency: The municipal court contract listed an effective date starting Jan. 1, 2022, which appears inconsistent with a Sept. 2025 authorization. The articles now explicitly report the date as recorded in the minutes and flag it for verification with city administration. 2) Missing agreement and loan details: The interlocal agreement and the DWSRF amendment were approved but the minutes lack the full agreement text, cost-sharing, and loan principal/terms. Articles now state that the minutes do not include those details and recommend requesting the full documents. 3) Public comment content not transcribed: The minutes list a public commenter (Don Berger) but do not provide his remarks; articles do not attribute content and note that the transcript lacked comment substance. 4) Acronym clarity: The minutes reference "DWSRF" without expansion; articles retain the acronym and note that the agenda did not expand it. 5) Procedural motions: The timeline clarifies which motions were to move items from discussion into business and which were final action votes. All articles were edited to avoid speculation and to rely only on text appearing in the minutes.