Task force clarifies 'measurable community impact' and reallocates leftover scoring points
Members debated outputs versus outcomes and opted to reallocate five leftover scoring points across existing impact questions rather than add a fractional prompt; they emphasized prioritizing lasting impact and aligning scoring with city priorities.
The full story
The allocation committee revisited the measurable community impact criterion and agreed that the scoring should reward demonstrable, lasting outcomes rather than only outputs. Kristen read the criterion’s definition and the committee discussed adding either a small extra question or redistributing five leftover points. "Measurable community impact" was defined as projects addressing a documented community need with sustained improvements beyond the grant period.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in