Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheltenham SD, township plan speed cushions and raised crosswalks; estimated cost $123,000 to be split

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance Committee reviewed a joint township–district plan to install speed cushions, refreshed pavement markings and raised crosswalks near elementary schools. The township estimated the work at $123,000 and requested the district split the cost; staff proposed using bus-stop enforcement funds to cover the district share.

At the May 6 Finance Committee meeting, district staff described a traffic-calming plan developed with the township to address dangerous driver behavior near several elementary schools.

The proposal calls for speed cushions, refreshed pavement markings and raised crosswalks at specific school-area locations. The township provided an estimate of about $123,000 to install the measures if township crews perform the work; the township requested the cost be split with the school district and the district suggested using bus-stop enforcement fines as the local funding source.

Board members asked practical questions about locations and drop-off configurations. Staff said not all roads around schools are township-controlled and that some locations may require additional coordination with state or county roadway authorities. Staff also provided a rough map indicating speed cushions on Front Street, two cushions and an elevated crosswalk at Glenside, cushions near Myers, and cushions with a raised crosswalk at Winco.

Several board members and a township commissioner who has worked on the project were thanked for their collaboration; no final funding vote was taken. Administration said a formal recommendation for a district contribution would be brought forward for board approval and that the proposed district contribution would be less than the prior year’s bus-patrol revenue.