Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Paid Family Leave Elected Officials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pine County board debates whether elected officials must pay into state paid‑leave program
Summary
County officials discussed a state paid‑family‑and‑medical‑leave law that appears to require payroll deductions from elected officials even though those officials cannot access benefits; staff recommended delaying a final decision while they seek legal clarity and look to peers.
Pine County commissioners spent part of a personnel‑committee discussion reviewing whether the state’s new paid family and medical leave requirement should be collected from elected officials, and if so whether the county can lawfully withhold contributions from officials who cannot access the benefit. The board did not adopt a final policy and directed staff to gather more information and consult peers before deciding.
The question arose as the county prepared a policy update to implement the statewide paid family and medical leave program in county payroll policy. County staff briefed commissioners that the statute does not explicitly exclude elected officials, and that other statutes on elected‑official compensation suggest their salary “may not be diminished” for time off, which complicates whether payroll deductions may be taken.
Board members and staff said the issue is unsettled statewide. County staff recommended adopting the drafted policy now and then separately deciding whether the county should deduct contributions from elected‑official pay, or delaying any deduction until legal clarity or legislative guidance is available. Commissioners generally supported deferring a final decision for one to two months and checking with the Association of Minnesota Counties and other local governments.
Discussion focused on two legal tensions. One reading of the paid‑leave law treats elected officials the same as other employees and therefore subject to payroll contributions. Another reading relies on an older statute that forbids using a compensation plan to diminish an elected official’s salary for vacation or sick leave, which proponents said could mean elected officials cannot be made to pay into a benefit they cannot use.
County staff said penalties or state enforcement for noncompliance are uncertain. Commissioners asked staff to research what other counties and cities are doing and whether a legislative fix is being pursued. Staff proposed returning with options and, if the board prefers, engaging AMC for guidance.
The personnel committee also approved a set of routine personnel actions (filling specific vacancies and an administrative policy update) while reserving further action on the elected‑official deduction question until the board receives more information.
Commissioners emphasized the issue is one of both legal risk and public perception: requiring contributions that cannot produce benefit payments to elected officials raises legal and fairness questions. The board did not adopt a permanent deduction policy at the meeting and left the matter for follow‑up.
