Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
AES tells commissioners its BESS design differs from Moss Landing; committee asks for full test reports
Summary
During a continuation of the appeal hearing, AES staff told Santa Fe County commissioners that the company’s containerized battery design, sensor suite and test program differ materially from the older Moss Landing installation and urged the board to review the company’s lab test and modeling reports before final action.
Santa Fe County commissioners asked AES Clean Energy to explain how the company’s proposed battery energy storage system differs from the Moss Landing incidents cited many times in public comment. The applicant described a suite of passive and active protections, full‑scale lab testing, and what it called several generations of improved architecture.
Why this matters: Opponents cited Moss Landing as a cautionary example; commissioners wanted a technical comparison and asked AES to provide the laboratory reports and modeling that support AES’s claims of reduced propagation risk.
What AES said and what commissioners asked
- Difference in design and scale: AES staff said Moss Landing involved older, retrofit technology in a former turbine hall and included stacked modules in dense racks. The AES representatives contrasted that with purpose‑built, containerized enclosures sized to industry…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
