Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Siding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independence commission approves siding replacement for 451 S. Second St.
Summary
The Independence Historic Preservation Commission approved a permit to replace front siding on a 1895 single‑family home at 451 South Second Street with conditions to preserve historic window trim and reveal.
The Independence Historic Preservation Commission on Monday approved an application to replace the front siding on a historic single‑family house at 451 South Second Street, with conditions focused on preserving existing window trim and the siding profile.
The commission voted to adopt staff findings and the recommended conditions for application CA‑2025‑01, which covers alteration of the front façade only of the 1895 house. The decision was made by voice vote; individual roll‑call tallies were not provided in the public record during the meeting.
Staff told the commission the house dates to about 1895 and shows later additions. Myra (staff member) summarized the staff report and emphasized the importance of preserving the depth and angled sill details that create the historic shadow lines around the windows. “In replacing the siding ... we want to make sure that the detailing around the windows is not lost so that depth is not eliminated,” Myra said.
The staff report said the existing siding is weather‑worn and has rot, and that replacing it is supportable under the Independence Development Code, Subchapter 59 (Historic Preservation), provided the window trim dimensions and siding reveal are documented and reproduced. Jeff Kennedy, the city building official, told staff the applicant could recreate the original shadow line by using a deeper piece of trim and installing the siding next to it.
Applicant Kevin Kriever told the commission the work will be limited to the west (front) façade. “There is no intention right now. We don't have any leaking of the windows on that property,” Kriever said, and added the project will include flashing replacement behind the window ledges to prevent future water intrusion. He said the new siding is cedar and that the contractor can match the existing profile.
Commissioners disclosed social and neighbor relationships with the applicant at the start of the hearing; the chair asked the audience whether any party objected to those commissioners participating, and no objections were voiced. After public testimony, a commissioner moved to approve the application “adopting findings, conditions, and staff recommendations as provided in the staff report.” The motion was seconded and passed by voice vote.
The commission’s approval includes conditions requiring documentation of window trim and sill dimensions and ensuring the replacement siding matches the existing reveal and pattern so the historic wall depth is retained.
The applicant may proceed with the work after obtaining the required building permits and complying with the conditions adopted by the commission. The commission noted that only the front façade was before them; other elevations are not part of this approval and would require separate review if modified.
