Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Goals Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss work plan and ask staff to clarify and prioritize code and planning goals
Summary
Commissioners reviewed the city’s planning and code‑modification goal list, asked staff to clarify what specific items mean (for example, 'update the zoning map'), and suggested priorities including ERU allocation policy, long‑range projects such as emergency management and wastewater alternatives, and clearer direction before staff proceeds.
During the May 27 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed a broad list of administrative and long‑range planning goals compiled by staff and council and provided priority guidance and requests for clarification.
Staff presented three categories — ongoing administrative goals, long‑range planning projects, and code modifications — and said council had compiled a wide goal list without internal prioritization. Commission members asked staff to clarify what some items mean in practice and to recommend sequencing. Commissioner comments emphasized focusing on items that are time‑sensitive or budgeted and warned against letting long‑range projects be perpetually deferred.
Commissioners suggested several near‑term priorities: developing a clear policy for ERU (equivalent residential unit) allocation, beginning work on emergency‑management‑related planning items that will be reflected in the Housing Production Strategy outcomes, and completing planning items that already have budget allocations (for example, zoning‑map updates where money has been set aside). One commissioner recommended a work session to define what “update the city zoning map” would mean in practice before allocating staff time.
Staff noted some items on the list are already scheduled and others were council priorities; commissioners asked that staff return with clarified descriptions, timelines where possible, and a proposed prioritization to guide staff work and future commission review.
Next steps: Staff will return with clarified task descriptions and suggested sequencing so the commission can provide a prioritized recommendation to council. No formal priorities were adopted at this meeting.
