Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Policies Meeting Notices Teleconference Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board previews policy updates on meeting notices, teleconference and disruption rules
Summary
The board reviewed four policy updates to align meeting notices, teleconference participation, public-comment procedures and conduct rules with recent state law; the updates will be posted for a future vote.
The Governing Board reviewed updates to four board policies on meeting notices, teleconferenced participation, public-comment accommodations and conduct at meetings and said the items will be placed on a future agenda for formal vote. Superintendent Presta presented the policy revisions and President Gallegos thanked staff for updating the language.
The board’s superintendent, Presta, told members the revisions include changes to how meeting materials and public-comment procedures are handled and to add processes for reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities in response to a state law. “...reflejar a nueva ley, la AB 24492022, que exige a las juntas directivas mantener y aplicar un procedimiento para recibir y resolver rápidamente las solicitudes de adaptaciones razonables para las reuniones de la junta directiva para las personas con discapacidad,” Presta said.
Board members discussed a separate update that would allow directors to participate by teleconference in certain emergency circumstances and clarified how the district will distribute documents that are provided to a majority of the board fewer than 72 hours before a meeting to remain compliant with the Brown Act language the policy references. Presta described the updates as four distinct proposals and recommended they be presented on the next meeting agenda for a vote.
The board also reviewed a proposed change to conduct rules, described in the materials as BB 9323 (conduct in meetings), updated to reflect a 2022 state law listed in the meeting materials as “SB 1100 of 2022” that authorizes the board president to remove a person who is disturbing a meeting after a warning and defines terms such as “disturb” and “real threat of use of force.” Presta summarized the change as adding a warning step before expulsion and clarifying definitions.
Presta said the packet also includes updates to the board’s agenda and materials policy (listed in the packet as BB 9322) to move certain public-comment materials into the body of agenda-related content and to add language about in-person and remote public-comment methods. She also noted a change to permit a director to request teleconference participation for emergencies that could not reasonably be placed on a published agenda, and a procedural revision about when prosecutors or an interested person must first file a civil action to remedy an alleged Brown Act violation before other remedies are pursued.
No vote on the policies was taken at the meeting; Presta and President Gallegos said the four revised policies will be presented at the next board meeting for formal action. The board did not indicate any differing positions among members during the discussion.
The policies referenced in the discussion will return to the board for consideration at a later date, so any implementation details or effective dates will be established if and when the board votes to adopt them.
