Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the English Learners Reclassification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District presenter outlines English‑learner reclassification rules, progress data
Summary
District staff explained the state-required English‑learner advisory meetings, described the CAT assessment and progress metrics, and reviewed school-level data showing many students did not meet the one‑level‑per‑year expectation for reclassification.
At the School Council meeting, Dr. María Álvarez, a district staff presenter, explained state requirements for English‑learner (EL) advisory meetings and the criteria used to reclassify EL students, and she reviewed district data showing mixed progress toward reclassification.
Dr. María Álvarez said the state requires schools to hold site-level EL advisory committees and asked principals to schedule ILAC meetings: “El Estado dice que es obligatorio que tenemos que tener esta junta.”
The presentation focused on the district’s use of the CAT assessment and a level‑progress indicator to track EL students. Álvarez described the level scale and the typical timeline for reclassification: students are assigned levels (1, 2L, 2H, 3L, 3H, 4); reclassification requires reaching level 4; and the district expects roughly one level of progress per year. “Para reclasificar necesitan un 4,” she said, and she explained that a student who does not reach reclassification by middle school faces additional English coursework in secondary grades.
Álvarez walked council members through school‑level charts showing year‑to‑year movement. She said some students made one or two levels of progress in a year while others maintained level or declined. The presenter noted that the district’s overall indicator fell from a green to a red status this year because a smaller share of students met the one‑year‑progress benchmark.
Discussion points from parents and council members included requests for more information on supports and how to help students progress. One parent suggested adding materials on Individualized Education Program (IEP) preparation to future parent training; Álvarez acknowledged the request and said the district would provide more information in upcoming meetings.
No new district reclassification policy was adopted at the meeting. Council members were asked to take school‑level data back to teachers and principals for local discussion; Álvarez said the district team will return in September with deeper data and guidance for families whose children approach grades where reclassification is especially consequential.
The council also announced an EL and site‑based training session on Sept. 18 led by Yolanda Barba and district staff, and it reminded members that ILAC/EL advisory groups are expected to meet four times per year.
