Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Committee declines to advance ballot measure on property-tax breaks for first responders after debate

5695283 · April 17, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution 1, which would have placed a graduated property-tax reduction for first responders on the ballot, did not pass out of committee. The measure was not referred to Appropriations (vote 1-3) and was later postponed indefinitely by reverse vote.

Senator Bazely presented Senate Concurrent Resolution 1 as an expression to place before Colorado voters a graduated property-tax reduction for first responders, including discussion about adding dispatchers; the sponsor said the change would be presented to voters as a ballot measure.

Sheriff Mike Sell described recruitment and retention challenges for paid and volunteer first responders in rural areas and said rising property taxes make it difficult for some long-serving responders to stay in place. He summarized the proposed structure as a graduated reduction in property taxes tied to years of service: an initial, modest reduction after one year of service, larger reductions for longer service, and a top reduction for those with three decades of service. The sponsor described approximate thresholds in committee discussion: a 10% reduction after one year, rising to 40% after an intermediate service period, and 50% after 30 years; the sponsor said dispatchers should be included as first responders under state law.

Howard Paul, communications director for the Emergency Medical Services Association of Colorado, urged inclusion of search-and-rescue volunteers, noting the statewide search-and-rescue network contributes thousands of volunteer hours and missions each year and that volunteers incur out-of-pocket costs for gear and travel.

Committee discussion included concerns that locking a fiscal policy into the state constitution or ballot measure could reduce property-tax revenue available to local governments that depend on those taxes for budgets, including counties, school districts and special districts. A committee roll call to refer the concurrent resolution to Appropriations failed by a vote of 1 to 3. A subsequent motion to postpone the resolution indefinitely carried by reverse vote, and the resolution did not advance.

Next steps: SCR 1 will not proceed from committee. Sponsors said they may introduce amendments on second reading if the bill reaches the floor, but the committee did not refer the measure forward.