Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Converse council adopts lower refuse rate increase, citing calculation discrepancy

3619884 · March 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council approved a lower refuse-rate increase after Interim City Manager Lanny Lambert recalculated Waste Management’s requested adjustment and found a smaller percentage under the contract’s 12-month average formula.

The City of Converse City Council on March 4 approved a smaller annual increase to the city’s municipal solid waste rate after staff recalculated the percentage Waste Management requested.

Interim City Manager Lanny Lambert told the council he checked the company’s inflation inputs against U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data and verified the vendor’s monthly numbers but found a different 12‑month average when he applied the contract’s timing. “When I ran it, I got 2.87%,” Lambert said, contrasting that with Waste Management’s submitted figure of about 3.24%.

The difference resulted from which consecutive 12 months were averaged under the contract. Lambert said the contractor’s letter was dated December and used the available preceding 12 months at that time; staff recalculated using a December–January window that incorporated full 2024 data and produced the lower percentage. Councilmember [name not specified] moved to adopt Lambert’s 2.87% figure; the motion was seconded and carried.

Mayor Suarez noted the per‑customer monthly difference—about eight cents per bill—would compound across the city’s population. Lambert recommended the city ensure future requests are presented on schedule so the correct 12‑month period is used under the contract.

The ordinance (first reading) amends Chapter 36, Article 2, rates and fees. The council approved the lower percentage under the contract formula; staff said the change will slightly reduce the vendor’s requested increase as billed to customers.

The council did not direct further action beyond adopting the staff calculation and emphasizing the need to process future rate letters on the contract schedule.