Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Refuse Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park County Solid Waste Board approves removal of two refuse assessments, 6-0
Summary
At its April 23 meeting the Park County Solid Waste Board voted unanimously to remove or update solid waste assessments tied to two rural properties after staff review found one in use as a residence and the other not a residence.
The Park County Solid Waste Board voted unanimously, 6-0, April 23 to pursue removal or update of two solid waste assessments after staff inspections recommended the charges be rescinded.
Board staff presented two abatement requests: one for 313 Hill Street in North Wilsall and another for 618 Castle Mountain Road. Staff reported the Hill Street property appears to be used as a residence and recommended not approving a refuse-abatement request on that basis. For the Castle Mountain Road property staff reported outbuildings on the parcel and said the site did not appear to be a residence; staff recommended removal of the solid waste assessment for that parcel.
On the Hill Street item a motion to remove or update the assessment was moved and seconded; the board voted in favor and the motion carried, 6-0. On the Castle Mountain Road item the board voted to remove the assessment, 6-0.
The board record shows the decisions were based on staff site visits and the panel’s determination about whether each parcel is a residence or a nonresidential property subject to assessment. No further appeals or additional paperwork were described at the meeting.
Votes at a glance - 313 Hill Street, North Wilsall — Motion (text in meeting record: “I move we can either request to to update or to, remove the the assessment.”). Second: Ken Paneo. Vote: 6 yes, 0 no. Outcome: approved (assessment removal/update). - 618 Castle Mountain Road — Motion to remove the solid waste assessment (motion and second recorded in meeting). Vote: 6 yes, 0 no. Outcome: approved (assessment removal).
The board did not discuss further administrative appeals or an effective date during the meeting; staff follow-up was implied but not specified.
