Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sanitation Fog Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deep Harbour advances kitchen grease program; staff to propose code changes for enforcement
Summary
City staff reported a year of FOG (fats, oils and grease) program work, cited fewer overflows and lower removal costs, and asked council for direction on code changes to allow automatic fines for repeat nonreporting.
Deep Harbour City Council study-session staff on Thursday described a year-long push to implement a fats, oils and grease (FOG) compliance program for commercial food establishments and asked council for direction on enforcement options.
The program aims to keep animal- and vegetable-based oils and greases out of the sewer system by requiring commercial facilities to install and maintain grease interceptors. "The goal that we have is simply to get people to use and maintain their interceptors appropriately," said Jeff, a city presenter, describing the education and permitting work staff and contractors have conducted since March 2024.
City staff told council they have issued 91 operational permits, used an online reporting portal to reduce field verification time, and tracked early performance gains: no grease-caused overflows in the last 12 months and a roughly 20% reduction in FOG removal costs compared with 2022. Officials said about 50–60 long‑standing establishments still lack interceptors and that interceptor sizes in the city range from small 15‑gallon units up to roughly 2,000–5,000 gallons for major users such as hospitals.
Permitting and reporting details: the city requires an operational permit (fee $500) and asks pumping contractors to submit maintenance reports to an online database; the city pays roughly $3 per contractor report to access that system. Staff said pumping intervals are set per facility (typically from 90 days to annually depending on size and usage) and that the online portal triggers red flags when maintenance or reporting are past due.
On enforcement, staff recommended a code amendment that would allow an automatic fine when a notice of violation (NOV) is issued to repeat nonreporting businesses. Jeff said the city currently relies on outreach, NOVs and the county health department’s authority to close food operations; the city has not yet forced a closure through the health department for FOG noncompliance. Council members asked about appeal rights and technical-reporting delays; staff said the proposed fine would be attached to the NOV and the civil-penalty process (which includes appeal procedures under existing city code) would not be the chosen mechanism for this specific reporting fine.
Council members expressed interest in pairing enforcement with outreach and potential recognition for compliant businesses; staff said they will research carrot-and-stick approaches, examples from other jurisdictions (such as Tacoma), and draft code language to present at a future study session. No formal ordinance or regulatory change was adopted at the meeting; staff will return with proposed code amendments and draft language for council review.
Staff also noted operational constraints: some downtown businesses cannot physically install large interceptors without costly excavation, and the city will continue to work with businesses on in‑ground or under‑kitchen solutions.
The council did not vote on any ordinance; staff were directed to return with draft code language on fines and with further research on enforcement models and outreach/reward ideas for compliant establishments.
