Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: consent calendar, work program and executive session motion approved unanimously

2849319 · April 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the meeting councilors approved the consent calendar, adopted the 2025–26 City work program, and voted to enter executive session; all recorded votes were 7–0.

The council recorded three formal actions during the meeting: approval of the consent calendar; adoption of the 2025–26 City work program by resolution; and a motion to go into executive session to discuss litigation.

- Consent calendar: Moved by Council Member Sweet and seconded by Council Member Falcone; vote 7–0 (approved). The consent calendar included payroll and claims and two proclamations (April as Autism and Neurodivergence Acceptance Month and April as National Arab American Month) among routine items.

- City work program: Moved by Council Member Sweet and seconded by Council Member Falcone, the council adopted Resolution 56 76 adopting the City work program for 2025–26; vote 7–0 (approved). The work program lists 12 initiatives including catalyzing the station area, code and state‑law implementation work, the SCADA project, and planning/program work across departments.

- Executive session motion: Council Member Falcone moved and Council Member Tim Chisholm seconded a motion to go into executive session to discuss litigation as authorized by state law; the council voted aye, motion carried 7–0.

Roll call earlier in the meeting confirmed the following council members were present for votes: Council member Tim Chisen; Council member Black; Council member Sweet; Council member Falcone; Council member Paschall; Deputy Mayor Arnold; and Mayor Curtis. All seven recorded votes on the motions above were in the affirmative.