Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Improvements topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fair board seeks electronic sign for Fallon County fairgrounds; gate design and timing deferred

2845795 · January 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The county heard a fair-board request for an electronic entry sign and changes to the front gate; commissioners raised concerns about timing, durability and future fairground development and asked staff to return with revised drawings and updated quotes from designer Neil before a decision.

Jennifer, representing the fair board, met with Fallon County Commissioners to discuss installing an electronic display sign at the fairgrounds’ front entrance and altering the entrance gate design.

The fair board said it prefers an electronic sign and has asked vendor Neil to prepare revised drawings that combine elements from two previously proposed designs; the board also asked that gate pricing be removed from the current quote while the design is revised. Commissioners asked whether the sign and gate would conflict with potential future fairground projects, citing possible large grants that could lead to building additions near the exhibit hall.

Commissioners and the fair board discussed technical and operational concerns: power availability for an electronic sign; whether the gate would need to open fully to allow carnival and vendor access and emergency vehicle access; the durability of gate and masonry features in high wind and extreme cold; and whether the sign’s size and location would remain appropriate if fairground layouts change. One commissioner noted a prior quote of about $32,000 for the electronic sign alone and said combined sign-and-gate work could total $40,000–$50,000 when including site work and concrete.

Because designer Neil had not provided the revised drawing and updated pricing, commissioners agreed to table the decision and asked staff to return the item to a future work session with the revised drawings, separate sign pricing (no gate), and updated cost estimates so the commission could take final action.

No formal procurement or contract award was made at the meeting; the item was deferred pending the designer’s drawings and an updated quote.