Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County reviews animal‑services contract terms and explores alternatives including jail‑based programs
Summary
Staff outlined terms for an annual animal‑services arrangement with the Humane Society of Southwest Washington at about $111,000 and said multiple cities have signed similar agreements; commissioners asked staff to study after‑hours vet coverage, livestock handling and models used in other jurisdictions.
Get email alerts on the Animal Services Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cowlitz County staff briefed commissioners on an annual animal‑services arrangement with the Humane Society of Southwest Washington and discussed outstanding questions about after‑hours veterinary costs, large‑animal response and program alternatives.
A staff member said key contract terms reflect an annual fee of $111,000 for animal services. The staff member also reported that Kelso, Longview, Castle Rock and Woodland had entered similar agreements with the humane society. Staff said contract language had been reviewed with the county prosecutor and counsel for the Humane Society of Southwest Washington, and that cities are meeting jointly to discuss next‑step options.
The nut graf: while staff recommended continuing with the humane society contract for the coming year, commissioners asked staff to clarify potential liabilities and costs not covered by the agreement — namely after‑hours veterinary expenses and large livestock response — and to explore alternatives used in other counties.
Commissioners discussed models used elsewhere, including a program mentioned in Maricopa County that integrated animal care with inmate labor, and staff said they plan a field trip to Thurston County to see a county/city joint operation for animal services. Staff also noted some work‑crew capacity constraints and that alternatives have been used for large livestock calls.
Ending: County staff said interjurisdictional discussions with the cities will continue and that they will return with more information on after‑hours veterinary costs, large‑animal arrangements and alternative program models observed in other counties.

