Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Education Civics topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee introduces bill to revise high-school civics instruction and testing

2664694 · March 11, 2025

Summary

The House Committee on Education introduced RS 32567, which would revise civics training requirements in public high schools and change the content and testing approach used for civics assessments.

Representative Joseph Wisniewski introduced RS 32567 to the House Committee on Education, saying the bill would move existing administrative rules into statutory code and revise requirements for civics training and related testing in public high schools.

The measure would change the content of civics assessments used in public high schools. "In the past the testing has been based on the naturalization test that foreign aliens are given when they apply for citizenship," Representative Wisniewski said. He told the committee that many items on that test are trivia — for example, naming oceans or rivers — and that the proposed bill focuses instead on topics more directly related to government and civic processes.

The bill text notes that the citizenship naturalization test currently used for comparison has a 60% passing threshold for new citizens; Representative Wisniewski said that threshold and question selection are not appropriate for measuring civic knowledge in high-school students. He said RS 32567 “outlines a whole bunch of other things that are more pertinent to the government and civics” and offered to take questions.

There was no further committee debate on the measure. Representative Hawkins moved to introduce RS 32567; the committee approved the motion by voice vote and the measure was referred to committee for further consideration.

The committee did not at this hearing set a statutory testing standard or specify a passing score for the new high-school civics assessment; the RS as introduced describes topics to be covered and transfers rule language into code. No formal amendments or fiscal details were presented during the hearing.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source