Resident cites Robert’s Rules and First Amendment during public comment
Jul 26, 2025
At the July 24 meeting, resident Vincent Castro argued a prior council vote was invalid under Robert’s Rules of Order and defended public dissent, urging protection for assembly and free expression; the mayor and mayor pro tem directed decorum during the remarks.
The full story
During the public-comment period, Vincent Castro of 503 North Fairview Street addressed the council about an earlier meeting item he said involved an improper vote and defended the public’s right to dissent. "According to Robert's rules of order, no vote is legal unless the chairman of the of the body that is overseeing the meeting calls for the vote," Castro said, arguing that a prior vote to "praise" the city manager had not been properly called by the mayor and therefore was invalid.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →