Commissioners discuss drafting public comment policy; staff to request examples from other counties

Carter County Commissioners Proceedings June 2, 2025 · June 2, 2025

Summary

Carter County commissioners discussed whether to adopt a formal public-comment policy to clarify when and how members of the public and county staff may speak at meetings; commissioners asked staff to solicit examples from other counties and return with a draft.

The Carter County Board of Commissioners discussed creating a written public-comment policy to clarify expectations for members of the public and county employees when addressing the board.

The board reviewed guidance from the county handbook and discussed two kinds of comment: non-agenda public comment (general input the public may provide) and comment on agenda items when the commission is about to take action. Commissioners emphasized that public comment periods are not the place to adjudicate interagency personnel matters or to conduct investigations; personnel issues should be handled through human resources or placed on a future agenda with appropriate notice.

Commissioners discussed practical measures to improve meeting clarity: requiring speakers to identify themselves when they begin, explicitly inviting public input before a formal vote, adding clearer packet distribution and agenda timing so commissioners and staff can prepare, and asking the county clerk to circulate sample policies from other counties and from Montana local government services.

The board directed staff to request public-comment policies and guidance from other counties and from the Montana local government services office and to prepare a draft for review. No policy was adopted at the meeting.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source