Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lee County commissioners debate creating COO post, defer formal approval
Summary
Commissioners discussed a chief operating officer job description, funding the role from a recent retirement, and concerns about chain of command and relationships with appointed authorities; no formal vote was recorded in the transcript.
Lee County commissioners discussed creating a chief operating officer position and whether to approve and post a draft job description, but the transcript does not record a formal vote.
Commissioner Cannon and other commissioners said the role could centralize economic development and grant-seeking work that the board’s members and staff currently do separately. “If they do a really good job, then we will have developments coming to Beulah, Board, Bartlett, Poco, Smiths, Salem, Waverly,” one commissioner said, describing the types of places the post would serve.
The discussion focused on two practical concerns: funding and the chain of command. Commissioners noted that Allison McCall retired three months earlier and suggested using money from not refilling her position to help fund the COO post. “If we decide to go this direction, let's don't fill that job right now. Let's save that money, put it toward this position,” one commissioner said.
Several commissioners raised concerns about how a COO would affect direct relationships between the commission and appointed authorities. “We can't then necessarily go to Rita or Rita come to us. We need… there is a buffer there that we have to respect,” one commissioner said, warning that day-to-day communications should not be broken by new layers of authority. Other commissioners said the COO should handle operational approvals and bring matters to the commission when required but should not replace direct contact for routine issues such as potholes or trash services.
Commissioners discussed salary comparators and experience but did not settle a pay range during the recorded discussion. One commissioner referred to Elmore County’s stated range for a similar post but the transcript's numbers were unclear. The commissioners also debated whether the position should be full- or part-time and how the position would interact with department heads (named in the transcript as Rita, Justin and Holly).
The transcript shows discussion and expressions of support and caution; it does not record a motion, second, or final vote to approve or post the job description. Next steps mentioned in the discussion included possibly approving and posting the job description at a future meeting and allowing a hired COO to adjust policies if needed.
