Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lorain County approves wage increase for non‑bargaining employees; commissioners debate retroactive pay rules
Summary
The board authorized a wage increase for non‑bargaining employees matching a United Steelworkers contract and discussed whether the raises and any retroactive pay should apply to employees hired after Jan. 1, 2025. Commissioners directed administrators to research application rules and report back.
The Lorain County Board of Commissioners on May 6 authorized a wage increase for non‑bargaining county employees to match a negotiated raise in the United Steelworkers Local 8845 agreement, with the change effective retroactive to Jan. 1, 2025, through Dec. 31, 2027.
Why it matters: Commissioners said parity with bargaining units is common practice but debated whether retroactive pay should apply to employees hired after Jan. 1, 2025. Several members expressed concern about retroactive payments’ budget impact and the need for clear, consistent policy going forward.
Discussion highlights: Commissioner Riddell said, "I don't like the retroactive and the bonuses... our budget's gonna get hit with some pretty hefty amounts," pressing administrators to clarify how hires after Jan. 1 would be treated. Board members asked the county administrator and human resources staff to research whether the retroactive component and the permanent pay bump should both apply to employees hired after Jan. 1 and to report back before the next pay period.
Decision and next steps: The motion to authorize the wage increase was moved, seconded and approved. Commissioners instructed administration to review hiring‑date eligibility, the mechanics of retroactive pay, and whether policy updates are needed to avoid future late implementation. Staff said they would return with recommendations and calculations to inform fairness and budget impacts.
Procedure note: Commissioners discussed the common practice of negotiating bargaining-unit terms first and then applying comparable increases to non‑bargaining staff; several members said they prefer starting and ending contracts on schedule to avoid retroactive adjustments.
What remains unresolved: The board did not adopt a final policy on how pay increases apply to employees hired after Jan. 1; administrators were asked to research and propose a consistent approach for application and bookkeeping.
