Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hickman County Commission: votes and approvals summary, April 28

3149493 · April 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its April 28 meeting commissioners approved multiple appointments, budget amendments and property transactions, authorized a settlement and voted on three zoning resolutions (one failed). Most motions carried by roll-call margins of 13–0 (one absent).

The Hickman County Commission on April 28 took a series of routine and substantive votes: appointments and notaries, budgets and budget amendments, property conveyances and surplus sales, a settlement agreement and multiple rezoning- and zoning-regulation items.

Key outcomes

- Judicial magistrates: Commissioners approved appointments of Cindy Bowman and Lisa Blystad by roll call (13 yes, 1 absent).

- Notaries: Three notaries (Melissa Horan, Carly P. Horner and Sarah Elizabeth Nash) were approved by roll call (13 yes, 1 absent).

- Property conveyance to 911 board: The commission authorized conveyance of two parcels (9 Mile Ridge and the remaining Highway 7 acreage after the tower survey) to the 911 board and authorized the county mayor and county attorney to execute documents when surveys are complete (roll call: 13 yes, 1 absent).

- Settlement: The commission approved a settlement proposal for $9,000 as recommended by counsel/finance staff (roll call: 13 yes, 1 absent).

- Surplus property / auctions: The commission authorized posting two surplus parcels (a previously declared 23-acre parcel and the remaining Highway 7 acreage) for auction (roll call: 13 yes, 1 absent).

- Budget amendments: The commission approved a series of budget amendments covering county-general maintenance and equipment, sheriff costs, school roof repairs and opioid funds, tourism signage, and solid-waste receipts and adjustments. Notable amounts included: - Amendment 2553: $43,232 (county general cleanup) - Amendment 2556: $21,500 (county general maintenance/tractor) - Amendment 2557: $5,000 (county general travel) - Amendment 2554: $45,000 (trustee commission correction) - Amendment 2555: $14,950 (tourism wayfinding signage) - Amendment 2558: $286,000 (sheriff—medical/food costs) - Amendment 2560: $1,350 (Bulldog signs) - Amendment 2561: $253,950.37 (school roof repair insurance/TCAT revenue) - Amendment 2562: $120,000 (school—opioid funding) - Amendment 2563: $109,000 (sale of land on Highway 7; makes solid-waste whole for road payment) - Amendments 2559 and 2564: solid-waste account cleanups and incoming funds

All listed budget amendments were approved by roll call (most recorded as 13 yes, 1 absent in the transcript where shown).

- Zoning and rezonings: - Resolution 25-12 (rezoning at 9231 Bates Trail): FAILED, 3 yes, 10 no, 1 absent. - Resolution 25-16 (rezoning on Hollywood/Windsor in Lyles): ADOPTED (roll-call recorded; transcript summary indicates majority approved with 1 no, 2 pass, 1 absent recorded in the roll-call notation). - Resolution 25-17 (amend Hickman County zoning regs related to Type 2 home occupation—building size increase to 5,000 sq ft and raised employee allowances; still requires BZA review for specific cases): ADOPTED, roll call 13 yes, 1 absent.

Votes at a glance (selected roll-call tallies from the record) - Multiple routine items, budget amendments and appointments: 13 yes, 1 absent (per roll calls recorded in the transcript). - Resolution 25-12 (Bates Trail rezoning): 3 yes, 10 no, 1 absent (failed).

What it means: The meeting approved the bulk of budget and administrative business required for county operations, authorized conveyances needed for 911 tower funding, and made a code change to give the BZA greater latitude on Type 2 home-occupation cases. The Bates Trail rezoning was the primary item that failed after residents and several commissioners highlighted road-access concerns.

Record and next steps: Several items (surveys, deeds, and the BZA review for Type 2 home occupations) will require follow-up by county staff and the county attorney; the sale and auction postings will proceed per the real-estate agreements provided to commissioners.