Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Code Omnibus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reports omnibus election code bill after technical updates and amendments
Summary
House Bill 592, the annual omnibus elections bill, was reported favorably after the committee adopted a technical amendment package that clarifies voter list maintenance, closed-primary timing, nursing-home early-voting procedures and other administrative updates.
House Bill 592, the committee’s omnibus election-code package, was presented by Chairman Bowyer with several technical and substantive updates recommended by the Secretary of State’s office and the State Board of Election Supervisors. Deputy Commissioner Laney Boyd summarized highlights: expanded definition of immediate family (to add grandparents/grandchildren), removal of outdated references to an electronic registration information center, authority to enter verification agreements with address-data vendors, and changes to report deadlines for the State Board’s annual report.
Other technical clarifications include consolidated-precinct language, posting results at precincts, mechanisms to address undeliverable nursing-home ballots (providing registrars a method to remove residents no longer at a facility), and authorization for the department to submit affidavits rather than live testimony in certain objections-to-candidacy suits. Representative Thomas, Newell and others asked for added clarity on the affidavit/attestation distinctions and on implementation timelines for changes to the nursing-home early-voting program; staff said the law already requires an election before contesting it and the amendments clarified timing for contests.
The committee adopted amendment set 11-20 (technical and clarifying edits and provisions to align delayed effective dates for closed-primary laws) and a number of other edits. A roll-call recorded on the measure showed the bill advanced out of committee (roll-call indicated 9 yeas and 4 nays on adoption with amendments); House Bill 592 was reported favorably to the House calendar with amendments. Witnesses present included Secretary of State staff and election supervisors; Bruce Riley (opposition card) raised procedural concerns about a provision clarifying the timing for election-contest litigation but the committee chair and staff said the change only clarifies current law.
