Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Administration County Operations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Farm owner alleges procedural failures, removal from relocation program

2606983 · March 13, 2025

Summary

A Lake County cannabis grower said he was removed from a relocation grant program after filing complaints and accused a county director of misconduct; he said he has contacted state and federal authorities. County staff did not take formal action during the meeting.

Justin Quayle, who identified himself as owner of Pillsbury Family Farms, used public comment at a Lake County Board of Supervisors meeting to allege procedural errors by county staff and to say he has been removed from a county relocation grant program.

Quayle said he has been in a relocation process for two years and described failures in how paperwork was served to his property. “We found out that there was no service of paperwork on my gate,” Quayle said. He said those procedural gaps meant he could not access grant funds intended to cover demolition and relocation costs.

Quayle alleged he was removed from the relocation grant program after filing complaints he described as “double payment” concerns and that a county director in the community-development department had acted improperly. “There's a power problem when you have…directors saying it's their self determination that you don't deserve to carry the product,” Quayle said.

He told supervisors he has raised the matter with the Department of Justice and said he had been advised to contact the FBI while also consulting private counsel in Sonoma County. Quayle said he obtained his cannabis license “the legal way” and that he has been the most transparent cannabis farmer on every level.

The board chair acknowledged Quayle's remarks and asked him to use the county email address for future correspondence; Quayle agreed. No formal board action, vote or staff direction was recorded in the meeting transcript related to Quayle's comments.

Quayle's remarks included allegations of legal and administrative wrongdoing; the county did not provide an official response on the record during the meeting. The transcript does not document any formal findings, staff reports or motions tied to the allegations.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source