Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Lawmakers and VSOs demand answers after VA workforce terminations, warn of service risks
Loading...
Summary
At a joint House-Senate veterans hearing, lawmakers and veteran service organizations pressed VA leaders and the administration for details about recent employee terminations, expressing concern that mass firings, probationary dismissals and hiring freezes could worsen access to care and claims processing.
House and Senate lawmakers and leaders of major veteran service organizations pressed for transparency and answers during a joint Veterans Affairs hearing after a wave of recent staff terminations at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The concern centered on sudden workforce actions described during the hearing as including roughly 1,400 additional terminations announced the prior night and earlier reductions that witnesses and members said total thousands. Senator Blumenthal, ranking member, told the panel that “another 1,400 members of the veterans family were fired from their VA jobs” and said those actions “will do significant and irreparable harm to the delivery of your care and benefits.”
The discussion mattered because witnesses and lawmakers said VA operations rely on a large, specialized workforce. Horace Johnson, national commander of AMVETS, told the committees that veterans rely on timely appointments and that delays in staffing “mean when people are sick, they're sick right then. They don't want to wait until next month.” Commander Daniel Contreras, national commander of Disabled American Veterans (DAV), and DAV executive director Randy Rees described cases of terminated employees who had strong performance records, including Veterans Crisis Line staff and claims coordinators, and said the organization was preparing its own statement on the terminations.
Members of both parties criticized the lack of full information from VA. Senator Moran said the committees had asked for lists of impacted employees by location and occupation and that the VA had responded with limited details, including a claim that none of the affected employees were in “mission critical” positions. Representative Takano said he had requested information about implementation of executive orders and personnel actions and had not received satisfactory responses. Lawmakers from both parties asked VSOs and staff to provide named examples and evidence of mission-critical roles lost so congressional offices could pursue specific inquiries with VA leadership.
Several witnesses warned that the workforce reductions risked undermining implementation of recently enacted programs. Witnesses noted that the PACT Act increased the number of veterans seeking care and benefits and that VA had surged hiring to handle that demand. Joy Elam, DAV legislative director, said VA had seen a surge in workload and that “we have staffing shortages that have been noted by the inspector general.”
At points the committee split on framing. Chairman Boss said he trusted Secretary Collins to “right size and reorganize VA” and repeated VA statements that the workforce reduction was less than 1% of a 400,000-employee agency. Ranking members and several witnesses disputed that characterization as insufficient reassurance, noting specific examples of front-line and specialized employees who had been dismissed. Witnesses emphasized differences in the types of separations: return-to-work departures, hiring freezes, probationary-terminations and other administrative actions, and asked Congress to distinguish the causes and operational impacts.
Lawmakers asked VSOs to submit names, dates and specific mission impacts to allow the committees and agency officials to investigate individual cases. Several members pledged to continue oversight and to request detailed lists and exemption requests that VA said the agency had available for impacted employees.
The hearing closed with repeated requests from lawmakers that VSOs and members of the public report cases where services have been reduced or a named employee appears to have been improperly terminated. "If you see a reduction in any service that is due to the change," said Chairman Boss, "or someone that you know works at the VA that has been improperly released from their employment, please come to me in my office because we will argue on their behalf." The committee offered members five legislative days to extend remarks and submitted materials into the record.
Ending: Lawmakers and VSOs left the hearing publicly urging the VA to provide lists, timelines and named examples so Congress can more precisely evaluate whether personnel actions are hurting veterans’ access to care and benefits. The committees said they will press VA leadership for the requested data and asked VSOs to document specific operational harms as they occur.
