Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident asks Boulder County to reopen cropland policy review, cites state statute and missing documents
Summary
Erin Meschke urged commissioners to begin a review of the county's cropland policy, saying required intervals under Colorado Revised Statutes have passed and several referenced policies and protocols are missing from county records.
Erin Meschke, a Boulder resident, urged the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners on Feb. 6 to initiate a review of the county’s cropland policy, saying the county is out of compliance with state statute and that several referenced policies and monitoring programs are missing from public materials.
Meschke told commissioners that “12/07/2024 was the 3 year mark from the last approval of the cropland policy per CRS 35Dash5.5Dash1074 a.” She said the county’s Integrated Weed Management Plan does not include all unincorporated land as required and that the county must revisit and approve a new cropland policy or risk noncompliance with state law.
Meschke listed 10 specific concerns she said require attention: the grassland management policy cited in the cropland document is not available online; a protocol for genetically engineered crop varieties is referenced but not posted; a promised three-year reevaluation of approved genetically engineered varieties should have occurred in 2024; glyphosate-resistant crops are planted but, she argued, should be prohibited under integrated weed management; tenant-rotation requirements for glyphosate-resistant and nonresistant varieties lack visible enforcement; a promised strategic integrated pest management program and monitoring program are missing; a county program to include new farmers is unclear; and the county water policy referenced has not been updated since 2012.
Meschke asked commissioners to place cropland policy discussions on an upcoming post-act agenda so the review can begin. She provided a copy of her list to commissioners during public comment. The meeting record does not show the board taking a formal motion or vote on the request during the Feb. 6 public comment period.
Meschke referenced Colorado Revised Statutes in her remarks; she characterized specific statutory timelines and said documents required by statute were not present in county materials. Commissioners asked her to send details by email to staff so they could locate and review documents.
No staff directive or formal board action to open the cropland-policy review was recorded on Feb. 6; Meschke’s remarks were entered as public comment and the board asked for follow-up via email.
