Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve expanded scope and additional funding for courthouse handrail project after staff raise structural concerns
Summary
The board approved a scope increase for a courthouse handrail project with CKJT after staff explained missing structural details in century-old drawings and recommended additional site visits and a mock-up; commissioners pressed the firm for assurance about further requests.
Get email alerts on the Facilities Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board approved Proposal 2025-0113 Maintenance 1, authorizing an expanded scope and additional funds for the courthouse handrail project with firm CKJT. The motion passed 3-0.
Public Works Director Rob Grandstaff explained that the courthouseโs original architectural drawings (circa 1915) lack structural-attachment details, creating uncertainty about where and how handrails can be attached without damaging historic fabric. CKJT requested more time and additional work, including engaging a structural engineer and performing on-site mock-ups to verify attachment methods. The countyโs representative said a structural engineerโs fee was estimated in the $600โ$1,500 range; the overall requested increase was described in the meeting as โabout $9,700โ (rounded to approximately $10,000).
Commissioners expressed concern about the size of the increase and whether the firm had sufficiently scoped the project before bidding. Commissioner Fulmer and Commissioner Clayton sought assurances that the additional work would resolve unknowns and avoid repeated requests for money. Staff said CKJT had reduced some fees and believed the added scope would complete design work, but staff would ask the firm for written confirmation that the amended scope would prevent further amendments.
Commissioner Fulmer and others said they were reluctant to stop midproject because of prior work already completed. The board voted to approve the proposal and directed staff to seek a firm commitment and, where feasible, negotiate costs.
