Get email alerts on the Professional Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears cleanup and pro‑tem changes to Professional Engineers Registration Act
Summary
Senate Bill 5090 would update the Professional Engineers Registration Act, including adding one Pro Tem board member (from two to three), revising terminology and clarifying educational equivalency and suspension rules. The board requested the changes; staff and the engineers board director described it as a cleanup bill.
Senate Bill 5090 would revise the Professional Engineers Registration Act to update terminology, modify the number and process for appointing Pro Tem members of the Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, clarify educational equivalency for registration, and remove obsolete language.
Committee staff said the board requested the bill. Among the changes: the number of Pro Tem board members would increase from two to three; the board chair’s appointment process and duties for Pro Tem members would be adjusted; the board’s authority to suspend registrations when certified by DSHS for noncompliance with certain orders would be revised; certificates’ validity periods would be set by the board rather than by a fixed December date; and some obsolete provisions would be removed. Staff reported no fiscal impact in the preliminary note.
Ken Fuller, director of the Washington State Engineers Board, testified in support and described the proposal as a “very easy cleanup bill.” Committee members had no substantive questions; the prime sponsor (as stated in the hearing) indicated it came at the board’s request.
No committee vote was taken at the hearing.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
