Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.
Peabody council grants JD Raymond special permit for mulching operation with strict conditions
Loading...
Summary
After extended public comment and testimony from city departments, the Peabody City Council approved a special permit allowing JD Raymond Transport to continue mulching, composting and outdoor storage at 25 Farm Ave, imposing conditions on hours, fire safety, stormwater controls, dust suppression and monitoring; the vote was 10–1.
The Peabody City Council on Jan. 23 approved a special permit allowing JD Raymond Transport Inc. to operate a mulching, composting and outdoor storage business at 25 Farm Avenue, subject to new conditions aimed at reducing fire, noise, dust and stormwater impacts.
The council’s vote — 10 in favor, 1 opposed — followed hours of testimony from the petitioner, neighbors, consultants and city officials. Attorney Kim Croa, representing JD Raymond, said the company has operated at the site for about 20 years and provides a city benefit by accepting landscape and clean wood waste for no cost then recycling it into mulch used by local groups and residents. “We’re asking the council to vote in favor of a special permit to allow JD Raymond to continue its long‑standing mulch operation,” Croa said.
The permit was contested by the owner of the adjacent property, Michael Weiss, and his attorney Jason Panos, who argued the operation has expanded well beyond simple mulching and presented evidence and complaints about pile heights, dust, noise and impacts to nearby wetlands. Panos told the council a September 2024 Land Court decision upheld cease‑and‑desist orders and found the use was not a lawful nonconforming horticultural use, and he urged denial or, if approved, strict conditions to protect the abutting future residential development. “A judge told us it is not,” Panos said, referring to the nonconforming‑use claim.
Councilors and city officials pressed both sides on fire safety, wetlands protections and enforcement. Captain Chris Dowling, the city’s fire prevention officer, said a 2022 joint inspection with the State Fire Marshal found noncompliant items that the company has since addressed and that he issued a permit on Jan. 17 to store forest products after work toward voluntary compliance. Dowling cautioned that mulch piles require special tactics to prevent and extinguish smoldering spots and said any required water supply for firefighting would be designed by engineers and could require more than one hydrant.
Councilor Julie Gamache, who moved approval, listed the council’s required conditions: keep entrances clear of debris; a fence with vegetative screening along the property line; follow the fire department’s requirements and install an additional hydrant or hydrants as the fire department and state marshal determine; a written operational plan and an emergency response plan; a complaint‑response contact (24/7); third‑party review paid by the applicant; dust suppression during windy days; limits on materials allowed on site (natural wood and brush only); metering of water used on site; and limits on grinding hours. The council adopted those and related conditions in its motion.
Key specifics the council included in the motion: - General hours of operation restricted to 4:30 a.m.–7 p.m. Monday–Friday and 6 a.m.–noon Saturdays; grinding (the noisiest operation) may only occur between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.; Sunday work is limited to emergency/ fire‑control operations. - The applicant must provide a written operational plan, an emergency plan, and a complaint response plan with a 24/7 contact, and fund a third‑party review of those items. - The applicant must mitigate dust on windy days and inspect incoming material to ensure only natural wood/brush is accepted. - All water used on site must be metered.
The council heard dozens of public speakers. Supporters included nearby businesses, a longtime tenant who said JD Raymond provides local jobs and donations to playground projects, and Crystal Papanicola, the property owner, who described JD Raymond as an “exceptional tenant” for 20 years. Opponents described repeated health‑department complaints going back to 2012, aerial and photographic evidence of expanded pile volumes, noise measurements showing grinding above recommended levels and concerns that the adjacent comprehensive‑permit 40B development (116 units) creates a sensitive residential use nearby.
Council debate addressed competing policy goals: preserving long‑standing local businesses and jobs versus protecting wetlands, abutters and future residents. Councilor Manning Martin voted no, citing concern that approving the permit could jeopardize the city’s subsidized housing inventory if the nearby 40B project were withdrawn; most other councilors supported the permit with the added conditions as the council’s way to manage the operation while legal appeals continue.
The permit carries implementation steps and risks: several required elements (stormwater controls, landscaping and some infrastructure) are pending administrative appeals at the state DEP and associated conservation approvals, and the council’s approval does not resolve those appeals. The council’s motion allows the city to require further work if third‑party reviews or fire engineering dictate changes.
The council directed that the conditions and enforcement expectations be attached to the special permit record and that city staff follow up on required plans, hydrant placement and third‑party review. The council’s motion passed 10–1.
