Bothell council approves consent agenda, including third amendment to Imagine Bothell implementation contract, 7‑0

Bothell City Council Meeting - January 14, 2025 · January 15, 2025

Summary

The City Council approved the consent agenda unanimously (7‑0). The motion was moved by Council member Kurt and seconded by Council member Aldrichs. The consent calendar included a third amendment to a consultant contract (listed in the packet) to support implementation of the Imagine Bothell comprehensive plan.

The Bothell City Council approved the consent agenda on Jan. 14 by a unanimous roll call vote, 7‑0. Council member Kurt moved the motion; Council member Aldrichs seconded it.

The consent agenda included an item identified in the meeting packet as a third amendment to the consultant contract with "Fair and Piers" (listed in the packet) for services to support implementation of the Imagine Bothell 2024 comprehensive plan. The amendment and associated work items listed in the packet include several planning tasks referenced by staff as next steps tied to comprehensive plan implementation (transportation impact fees among the items noted for further work).

Roll call recorded by the city clerk: Councilmember Zorns — Yes; Mayor Mason Thompson — Yes; Councilmember Aldrichs — Yes; Councilmember Kurt — Yes; Councilmember Manke — Yes; Councilmember Dodd — Yes; Deputy Mayor Alcobra — Yes. The clerk announced the motion passed 7‑0.

Ending: The consent agenda passed with unanimous approval; the specific contract amendment will proceed to execution per normal procurement and contracting processes and will be reflected in future staff reports as work tasks are completed.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source