Arris project continued after missing hard-copy inserts; commission votes 4–3 to defer
The commission heard a presentation on the Arris development but continued the quasi-judicial hearing to the February meeting after staff said required hard-copy inserts were not submitted; the application was otherwise complete electronically.
The full story
Planning staff told the Planning Commission that the Arris development application was complete electronically but that required hard-copy inserts and certain packet exhibits had not been turned in in time under county policy. Staff recommended a continuance to allow time to provide missing hard copies and affidavits of notice.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or