Get email alerts on the Idla Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State Board proposes IDLA rule edits to emphasize LEA collaboration and final projects
Summary
State Board staff described a draft rule for the Idaho Digital Learning Academy that adds language encouraging local education agency collaboration and explicitly allows comprehensive final projects instead of high‑stakes exams.
The Idaho Digital Learning Academy (IDLA) draft rule changes were presented to the House Education Committee to encourage closer collaboration with local education agencies and to recognize comprehensive final projects as an approved assessment option.
Matthew Scribe, presenting for the State Board of Education, said IDLA asked to add language that clarifies "approved site under protected conditions" and explicitly references comprehensive final projects as an acceptable assessment. "It was a lot of the times we see these teachers moving away from high stakes exams to final projects," Scribe said, describing IDLA's interest in offering locally coordinated final assessments and working with districts during end‑of‑course evaluation.
The rule language aims to foster more cooperative arrangements with local districts for course finals and to reflect instructional practices used in online and blended settings. The committee did not take votes; staff said they would continue rulemaking work and provide incorporated references as requested by legislators.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
