Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
US 17 corridor study team outlines visioning process, community engagement and draft schedule
Summary
Consultants presented the US 17 Corridor economic development study, described three project phases, reported about 50 online survey responses and outlined a public engagement schedule through April 2026.
Consultants updating Hardee County officials on the US 17 Corridor economic development study told commissioners on Oct. 2 that the project will complete an implementation‑focused corridor vision by April 2026 after a three‑phase process of discovery, planning and reporting.
Jessica Rossi of the consultant team (with Central Florida Regional Planning Council support) described the study area as the full length of US 17 within Hardee County, roughly a 24.8‑square‑mile study area with a population of about 8,600 and more than 4,000 jobs. The project will examine land‑use, transportation, stormwater resilience, economic opportunities and neighborhood stabilization.
Consultants said the project kicked off in spring 2025 with a discovery phase that included stakeholder interviews, civic organization meetings and a six‑week online engagement window. Rossi said the online survey closed with about 50 responses; staff characterized that as a modest number but said the depth of input — including a mapping activity where respondents placed comments on specific corridor locations — produced useful qualitative data.
The next phase is a technical planning phase where staff will draft vision and goal statements and assemble an existing‑conditions (corridor characteristics) report currently in internal review. A larger community workshop is planned for early 2026, with additional advisory‑committee meetings and pop‑up outreach activities to meet residents where they are. The final report and implementation package are scheduled for April 2026.
Commissioners asked about outreach frequency and formats; Rossi said the project team can brief commissioners in group workshops and is willing to meet one‑on‑one when more focused discussions are helpful. Commissioners expressed support for a public workshop format to gather collective feedback and suggested that board workshops could produce stronger, consolidated input.
Project staff said they are coordinating with Polk County planners because the US 17 corridor crosses the county line; the Hardee County effort is slightly ahead in schedule and the teams will align studies where the corridor meets the boundary.
Rossi encouraged the board to review the corridor characteristics report when staff completes internal reviews; the consultants will post materials to the project website and seek more public feedback as the plan phase proceeds.
