Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baker County commission votes to proceed with full impact-fee and special-assessment study
Summary
Commissioners authorized staff to proceed with a contractor engagement to study impact fees for fire, EMS, law enforcement, parks, roads and schools and a special-assessment review of solid waste; the county budgeted $100,000 for the work and the school board has indicated it will fund its share.
Get email alerts on the Finance Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Baker County Board of County Commissioners voted to proceed with a comprehensive impact-fee and special-assessment study, authorizing staff to engage the proposed consultant to evaluate potential fees and assessment methodologies across multiple service areas.
County staff told commissioners that $100,000 was budgeted in the current fiscal year to cover the county’s portion if the board chose to study all options. Staff said the Stantec (via legal/consultant engagement) approach permits combining multiple studies — fire protection, emergency medical services, law enforcement, parks and recreation, transportation (roads), and schools — to reduce duplicated work and lower the overall cost. The school district has verbally committed to funding its portion of the schools analysis, which staff said would increase the total project cost to about $117,000 before the school share, but leave the county portion at roughly $100,000.
Commissioners emphasized that authorizing the consultant to do a full analysis does not obligate the board to adopt any new fees or assessments. Multiple commissioners supported completing a full, defensible analysis so the county can make informed decisions later; several specifically said they will be skeptical about adopting many of the possible assessments but wanted the data. Commissioners singled out solid waste, parks/recreation and fire/EMS as areas with clear funding pressures.
County staff said that, once the board instructs staff to proceed, the consultant will provide a checklist of data the county must supply and that the contract’s one-year clock begins at engagement; to avoid delay staff recommended the board provide any available background documents before the contract is executed. A formal motion to engage the consultant for the full study passed by voice vote.
Next steps: staff will work with the vendor and the school district to collect required data and return with a proposed scope and schedule; the consultant will produce defensible methodologies and recommendations, which the board may accept, modify or reject.
