Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whatcom County data work group urges county ownership to implement Village Reach recommendations
Summary
Data work group members told the Behavioral Health Committee the Village Reach report’s recommendations will not move forward without a county owner, funding and a three‑year implementation plan; council staff said the task force package was forwarded to council on Oct. 2.
Members of the Whatcom County Behavioral Health Committee’s data work group told the task force on Oct. 21 that the Village Reach report’s recommendations cannot be implemented without a designated county owner, a funded implementation manager and a multi‑year budget plan.
The work group’s co‑members said they had endorsed Village Reach and forwarded that endorsement to the larger task force. Dean (work group member) said the group’s sense is “without substantial investment” in a dedicated manager and data infrastructure across county agencies there is little the work group can further accomplish. Bertie (work group member) said the recommendation currently lacks an owner and urged the committee to identify which county office will carry it forward.
Why it matters: The work group framed data as the “circulatory system” that lets agencies communicate eligibility, status and aggregate outcomes for diversion and reentry. Without a county office to lead budgeting and procurement, the recommended county‑wide data infrastructure risks stalling and the county will lack evidence to evaluate whether diversion goals are being met.
What members discussed: Dean and Bertie emphasized two near‑term priorities from the Village Reach recommendations — hiring a person to manage implementation and developing infrastructure across justice and health partners over the next 12–24 months. Bertie said that at a recent task force meeting an executive‑office staffer asked for a three‑year plan with budgeted steps, but that responsibility had not been assigned.
Council staff perspective: Joel Nixon, identified on the call as a council staff person, said the task force forwarded its recommendation to the County Council on Oct. 2 and that council work typically proceeds slowly: “Council moves slower than that,” he said, and suggested timing could improve after the Nov. 4 election when some council seats will be settled.
Next steps and direction: Committee members proposed revisiting the data implementation question in January or February after the election. The data work group will continue advocacy, but members said the county executive’s office, the steering committee or the County Council will need to accept ownership and incorporate a budget to move from recommendation to implementation.
Ending: The committee did not take a formal vote on ownership or budgeting at the Oct. 21 meeting; members asked staff and co‑chairs to pursue identification of an owner and to place the item on a future agenda for follow‑up.
