Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustee Jensen proposes 'Normalized Academic Growth' metric to track student progress
Summary
Trustee Debbie Jensen presented a measure called Normalized Academic Growth, proposing a 10% growth target for student groups and explaining the pre/post formula she recommends for classroom and school‑level use. Trustees responded positively and discussed using the measure to guide instruction and district evaluation of materials.
Trustee Debbie Jensen presented an overview of Normalized Academic Growth to the Spring ISD Board of Trustees during the Aug. 12, 2025 meeting, describing the metric, examples of application and proposed targets for the district.
Jensen said normalized growth measures learning gains by calculating the gain a student makes divided by the possible gain remaining after a pretest: (posttest – pretest) ÷ (maximum possible – pretest). She gave two examples: a student who moves from 40% to 70% on a measure has a normalized growth of 0.5; a student who moves from 80% to 85% has a normalized growth of 0.25. Jensen described a scale often used in education: under 0.3 indicates low effect from instruction, 0.3–0.7 medium, and over 0.7 high.
Jensen said the district’s draft target is 10% normalized growth each year and that the measure can be used for individual students, subgroups (economically disadvantaged, special education, emergent bilinguals) and to evaluate instructional materials and practices. She framed the metric as a way to recognize progress even if students do not cross an absolute proficiency threshold on a single test.
Board members responded positively. Trustee McDaniel and Trustee Duran characterized the approach as a way to motivate and celebrate student improvement rather than focus only on end scores. A board member noted state legislation and broader conversations about STAR exams and assessment practices; Jensen and colleagues said normalized growth can provide teachers with actionable, real‑time data to adjust instruction.
Ending: Trustees agreed to continue discussion and promotion of the metric internally; no formal policy vote or adoption occurred at the meeting. Staff and leadership will consider how normalized growth may be incorporated into district evaluation and reporting processes.
