Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Committee backs bill asking CDE to produce model policy on off‑campus cyberbullying
Loading...
Summary
AB 772 would require the Department of Education to develop a model policy districts could adopt or adapt to address cyberbullying that occurs off campus but affects school climate. Supporters said districts need clarity; the California School Boards Association opposed the amended bill on scope concerns.
The Senate Education Committee advanced Assembly Bill 772, which directs the California Department of Education (CDE) to develop a model policy addressing certain cyberbullying and harassment that occurs outside school hours and off campus but has a demonstrated nexus to the classroom or campus.
Author Assemblymember Lowenthal said social media has blurred when and where bullying occurs and school staff are often left unsure whether they have authority to intervene. "AB 772 will help provide districts with the necessary clarification on actions they can take to ensure all students enjoy a safe and productive learning environment during school and after school," he said.
Elementary principal Dr. Monica Valencia and Pamela Gibbs of the Los Angeles County Office of Education described examples in which off‑campus group chats and social posts affected students' mental health and attendance. Valencia said many parents lack the technical familiarity to monitor platforms and seek help from schools.
The California School Boards Association opposed the amended bill, saying districts already have jurisdiction under Education Code where a nexus to school exists and warned against expanding district reach into private, off‑hours conduct. "Is it appropriate for a school to address the behavior of a student that occurs during a weekend that has no relation to school?" the association's witness asked.
Committee members pressed for clarity on training and support for implementation; LACOE said county offices should be available to assist districts. The committee did not take the final vote while chairing duties rotated, but the author indicated he would move the bill when absent members returned; the bill was ultimately reported to Appropriations with the committee's recorded motion and support.
Why it matters: As students use messaging apps and social media outside school, districts say the emotional and instructional impacts often follow students into classrooms. Supporters say a state model policy can reduce inconsistent legal interpretations and guide district-family coordination; opponents worry about scope creep into purely private matters.
What's next: AB 772 was advanced from the committee for fiscal review and possible amendment.
